Meadows supporters denied ‘open justice’ after security refuse entry to court

DOZENS of people planning to support two defendants at Woolwich Crown Court today were forced to spend hours in freezing conditions after security refused them entry saying the courtroom was full despite being empty and the trial yet to begin.

When the retrial of student protesters Alfie Meadows and Zac King began at around noon, eleven of the 18 seats in the public gallery were empty.

Matthew Meadows, Alfie’s father, was livid at the interference to support for his son.

About half a dozen supporters, who refused to give up despite the wind and snow, were eventually let in after complaints were made to the court manager, who subsequently approached the judge to justify the move.

On the court manager’s behalf the judge said there were concerns over friends and family fighting for the limited number of seats and that he would not tolerate any trouble.

But there was no basis for such concerns given the same judge moved the previous trial (of the same case) from a high security courtroom to a regular one commending the defendants’ supporters for their good behaviour.

Security also attempted to stop a member of the press entering, but relented when challenged and getting ‘authorisation’.

Open justice is a key tenet of a democracy and demands trials are heard in public without good reason.

In 1998 Lord Woolf, during a judgment in the Court of Appeal, said: “[Open justice] is necessary because the public nature of proceedings deters inappropriate behaviour on the part of the court. It also maintains the public’s confidence in the administration of justice. It enables the public to know that justice is being administered impartially. It makes uninformed and inaccurate comment about the proceedings less likely.”

The jury were eventually sworn in with the prosecution to begin making its case tomorrow (Tuesday).

3 thoughts on “Meadows supporters denied ‘open justice’ after security refuse entry to court

  1. Similar attempt to exclude me fm the trial of Ian Tomlinson’s ‘alleged ‘ police killer….staff at Southwark Crown court initially denied knowledge of trial,strewed the contents of my rucksack over conveyor belt in order to delay my entry and later denied that there was a transcript of trial. On the day I attended a whole swathe of prosecution evidence was put forward for exclusion by killer policeman hardwoods defence lawyer…there was no senior lawyer present for either the family or the so called Independent Police Complaints Authority…..something seriously undemocratic happened that day….I wrote to the family lawyer but no response.

    when I tried to give money to the family campaign for justice,my Internet access was blocked… can now give via Newham Police Monitering Unit…Since attending an Ian Tomlinson commemoration ,I have been followed constantly by the police….

  2. It’s appalling but not surprising that Alfie Meadows’ THIRD trial is beginning in this utterly biased way – at once petty and shameful, as the entire situation is.

Don't be shy, leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s